We have reported on the cozy relationship the website Think Progress has with this White House in the past. I think that it can be fairly said that TP is pretty much a propaganda vehicle. Basically an outlet of gussied up talking points for the #oldmedia to regurgitate. It certainly is not a legitimate news source. (As the below report from The Daily Caller illustrates.)
On illegal immigration I am of mixed opinion. On the one hand I believe that someone who is willing to work hard and to contribute to society and the economy, who is looking to make a better life for him or herself and his or her family is someone we should welcome to our country. We should respect the pursuit of happiness.
On the other hand we should also respect the rule of law, and for good or ill, we have immigration laws in this country.
I’d encourage everyone to read the attached article because it is a lovely example of the infatuation some people have with their masters. Actually that’s not fair. The guy makes plenty of good points from the progressive perspective. All the ones one would expect. We wouldn’t have any roads without government. (We would.) We’d all die from salmonella poisoning without the government. (We wouldn’t) Society would devolve into a scene from Mad Max where kids with mohawks marauded through the mall with chainsaws. (It wouldn’t.) All the ones one would expect.
Above was the moment when Putin knew for sure that Obama wasn’t much of a player.
The bankers truly, deeply fear Bitcoin. Again, I say this not as an advocate. I prefer the old gold and silver. But I love, I mean love that Bitcoin is tying the establishment in knots. It is super fun to watch. Read, please read, the attached article as the author waxes on and on about how only white males like Bitcoin anyway so it should be taken down.
And the headline comes from the mouth of a professor at George Washington University, testifying before the House, who says he agrees with many of Obama’s policies.
In January Bloomberg reported that Tim Geithner called the CEO of Standard and Poor’s after the company downgraded US debt to explain that the move would have “ramifications” for the company. Now S&P finds itself embroiled in a lawsuit driven by the Justice Department which S&P says is punishment for the downgrade.
Regulations can be used as a weapon. They often are. Dodd-Frank is an example of this. The big banks were in on the writing of the legislation and the little banks, the community banks, were left out in the cold. Too big to fail and too small to succeed, as determined by the state.
I personally like Ralph Nader. I think he’s wrong on all sorts of things but the sense when one meets him is that he is a man who really thinks about the issues and who does not drift with the political wind. He seems to be intellectually honest, which even though he’s completely off base on all sorts of issues, counts for a heck of a lot. Especially in Washington DC. He could have sold out. He never did.
Old programs never die. Sadly they don’t fade away either. Sometimes they change their name though, and such is the case with the Federal education program which subsidizes broadband for schools, E-Rate. After a bunch of bad press and general mismanagement it changed its name to ConnectED. (Get it?)