Eh, no big deal. What could 2 billion dollars worth of arms in the Middle East do anyway?
Go to it auditors. Let’s see what’s in that mess. I mean, it sounds like even the Pentagon doesn’t know. (In fact we are almost sure that the Pentagon doesn’t have a real grasp on costs. They haven’t had to have a grasp because Republicans (and Dems too – but Dems tend to think wasting the taxpayer’s money isn’t such a big deal) have always given the military piles and piles of money.
Audit and then cut.
Good luck David Norquist. Audit that Pentagon. The place is a fiscally target rich environment.
Audit the Fed and audit the Pentagon.
We need to be cutting everywhere and there are billions and billions which should be cut from the Pentagon budget.
Not that astonishing to us. But it is still nuts.
Why do conservatives always fall for the defense spending bit? We should be cutting agencies AND the Pentagon, not expanding the Pentagon.
Conservatives want lower taxes right? Smaller government? Well, the military is BIG government, and often deeply crony to boot.
Necessary? Yes. But at current levels? No.
The military is big government. Real big. We spend vast vast sums on the military now. What we need is a smaller, less manpower intensive, more specialized, and less expensive military.
Military spending and the Military Industrial Complex is one of the cronyist parts of the government. But “conservatives” always give such spending a pass. They should not.
We love the cuts to other agencies but why not just give it back to the taxpayers whence it came?
So “performance” is the “primary retention factor” NOW? What was it before?
No no Mr. and Ms. Taxpayer, everything is fine. Fine. Just a couple of little hiccups.