“I would get rid of the Federal Reserve because the volatility in the economy is primarily caused by the Fed,” Allison wrote in 2014 for the Cato Journal, a publication of the institute.
I like John Allison. A few years ago I helped put together a forum on Wall Street in which John Allison participated. Since then I’ve talked with him a couple of times. In another life I worked for BB&T while Allison was CEO of the company.
We think Harriet Tubman isn’t such a bad choice. However, removing Andrew Jackson from the currency is a shame. He killed the first central bank of the United States, The Bank of the United States, and that is something for which every American should be grateful. He is in addition the only president who with the help of allies paid off the national debt.
How nice for him.
Geithner speaking at the Center for American Progress. No doubt discussing the ins and outs of private equity economics.
I am actually speaking at a conference put together by an Objectivist organization tomorrow so I have Ayn Rand on the brain. (Rand’s philosophy is called Objectivism.)
Now I am not really an Ayn Rand guy. Ms. Rand once referred to libertarians (with whom I identify) as “right wing hippies.” And she didn’t mean it as a compliment.
Even still her thinking and writing are absolutely vital to the libertarian canon. She is also the most important and most influential female thinker of the 20th Century.
It’s their money. They earned it. It sounds like they hadn’t had the easiest of lives. (Not that that matters in this equation fundamentally.) If they want to leave their fortune to the US government that is their business. It appears that theirs was a gesture of thanks to a country which took them in and which became their home.
I appreciate that sentiment very much.
But the US Treasury?
So what’s $3 billion not appropriated by Congress?
Congress didn’t authorize this payment. What gives?
Sadly the answer is all too familiar. Rule of law be damned.
Some Senate Democrats are (rightly) taking on the President over his nomination of Lazard’s global head of investment banking, Antonio Weiss, for Treasury undersecretary. Part of the problem is that Lazard is going to pay the guy $20 million in a bonus if he takes the job in government.
Now why would a global investment bank pay a C-level employee $20 million to go work for the government?
As I’ve said before, the Fall of 2008 is seared into my brain. I remember the exact moment when I heard that Greenspan said we were looking at a “once in a century” financial crash. I remember Lehman going down. I remember Goldman being saved. I remember when AIG which reinsured much of Wall Street was commandeered. I know it was a dark time for everyone but trust me, in the financial sector it was absolute insanity.
One could feel how fast and loose things got all of a sudden.
If you remember the post we recently did about the “new serfs,” well, below is a good example of this reality.
TARP was the absolute height of crony capitalism. Many of the big banks should have gone down, but in the midst of a “Blackberry panic” – as David Stockman puts it – the masters of the masters of the universe lost sight of reality and the nature of markets. Yes, Goldman Sachs would have gone down. But this would have been a GOOD THING. The blood which should have filled the the streets of Downtown Manhattan would have washed the unsustainable leverage clean from the system (for a while).
According to this review Mr. Geithner thinks quite a lot of himself. He takes credit (credit?) for the lion’s share of the TARP bailout, which he sees as a success and not as many have come to see in the years since, an overreaction to a meltdown brought on by easy money which fundamentally undermined our economy.
Always will be.
No biggie. $11 billion here. $11 billion there. And because Treasury sold the shares back to GM, even though it was at a loss, the move took the restrictions off of executive pay. So that’s nice for the executives.
In January Bloomberg reported that Tim Geithner called the CEO of Standard and Poor’s after the company downgraded US debt to explain that the move would have “ramifications” for the company. Now S&P finds itself embroiled in a lawsuit driven by the Justice Department which S&P says is punishment for the downgrade.