My dad used to make the point that the color TV we had growing up, a pretty basic model as I remember, was a miracle. He explained that 20 years before the technology we had sitting in our den couldn’t be had at any price. 100 years before I was watching Scooby Doo the idea of a color TV was the stuff of wild science fiction. 100 years before that it probably was inconceivable.
And my childhood was before the Internet and iPhones,
As a longtime resident of government employee country I say this plan couldn’t come soon enough. The bureaucracy in DC is massive, expensive, and entitled. Given the degree to which technology could easily reduce the bloat in the city and beyond wins should come early and relatively easily.
Wins for taxpayers anyway. Washington, the “imperial city” won’t like it and will scream bloody murder. On the other hand recent reports said that up to 35% of federal workers said they’d consider quitting their jobs if Trump became president.
This is the sort of thing that happens when one tries to keep reality at bay with ultra loose monetary policy.
According to financial disclosures, Clinton shifted the ownership of their New York house to residence trusts in 2011, which could save them hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes.
When you take the total amount of money the Clintons have made, allow for taxes and spending, her reported investment assets are still quite a bit too low to make sense. The likely explanation is that she and Bill diverted money to what are called Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts or GRATS.
Yeah it’s pretty scary.
Who is better off on average (In terms of per capita GDP)? The people who live in Belgium or the people who live in New Mexico?
This is not news to many of our readers. Of course some will blame Reagan. Some will blame NAFTA. Some will blame Obama. But fundamentally the 2 things which are driving the erosion of the middle class, as I see it, are the financialization of the economy and over regulation. (Taxation is an important factor too.)
A wonderful video from Hans Rosling and Chanel 4 News explaining global wealth in relative terms.
Sometimes wheeling and dealing isn’t always the best way. At least for those of us with very wealthy parents who are inclined to start us off with a nice pile of money.
This speaks to the “financialization” of the modern economy we referenced in a post yesterday. In a fiat currency world the banks truly, and almost totally run the show. The central banks particularly. And the American Federal Reserve most of all. If one is riding the financial asset train one is likely better off than one was in 2000. If however one is not on that train, if one lives in the real economy as most middle class Americans do,
I listened to the Holy Father’s speech today and I thought it was quite good. He didn’t drop any bombs in the House chamber. (Perhaps he’s saving them for the UN General Assembly.) He seemed generally respectful and the kind of priest I wouldn’t have minded listening to on Sunday morning. He struck me as warm. As we’ve said before, we quite like Pope Francis on many levels, but his economics could use some work.
We are not the only ones who feel this way.
Wouldn’t that be great? Porsches for everyone! Well, not really. Perhaps some groceries in most cases.
An interesting little experiment. We’re guessing that the interns at Bloomberg needed something to do one afternoon.
The voluntary exchange of goods and services, the essence of capitalism, is the most moral way to organize an economy. (It’s really self organizing mostly.) You give me something I want. I give you something you want. We both walk away better for the transaction.
Whereas socialism, often couched as somehow morally superior to capitalism, is based fundamentally on theft. Be it of wages, time, property etc. It is driven by force. As such it is deeply immoral.
The state would prefer to keep the capitalists down on the bottom. Innovators make things uncomfortable for the powerful and connected.